Recent versions of Windows come with a more powerful file copy handler; however, there are still some things that it cannot do.
Some of the advantages of using TeraCopy is that it can check the accuracy of the copying process. Besides, it can handle various types of conflicts, as when there is another file with the same name on the target location or when the source becomes unreachable. Another benefit is the possibility of managing a copy queue instead of dealing with various separate windows. Although it is said to achieve higher transfer speeds than the operating system’s native tool, this is not true. In fact, TeraCopy seems less efficient when transferring a large number of small files. Finally, it can make data transfers over a network, FTP sites are not supported, though.
All in all, TeraCopy may be not as necessary as it was some years ago. Yet, it is still a good alternative if you do not like the standard copy handler. Fortunately, if you use it only at home, you do not need to pay for a license. The paid version also lets you save reports in HTML and CSV file formats and remove specific files from the copy queue.
Pros
- Accurate copying
- Copy queue
- Conflict handling
- Support for network folders
- Shell integration
Cons
- Less efficient than Windows copier when working with a large number of smaller files
- FTP not supported
I use a transfer program called Gs Richcopy 360 and it seems to work pretty well. I believe it is better than Teracopy.
Crashes regularly, version 3.8.5.
Does not have a great impact, especially in network speed.